![]() ![]() Director Tom Elkins and writer David Coggeshall put together quite an impressive ghost story with "The Haunting in Connecticut 2: Ghosts of Georgia." While "based on a true story," it's obvious some creative license is utilized to spice things up. The souls of the slaves are restless and begin haunting the family for unknown reasons. Upon investigating, they find out their house is located on land once owned by a stationmaster of the Underground Railroad. Their daughter, Heidi, soon begins telling her parents she talks to a man who warns they're in danger. ![]() The Wyrick family moves into a country house in Georgia. If the producers of a movie can't decide on a better name for a film, then how could they make bigger decisions during production? Just pick a name! Was "Ghosts of Georgia" any more generic than "The Haunting in Connecticut?" The reason I sound so frustrated is because it deserves better. With a paradoxical title like that, audiences are given a red flag immediately. "The Haunting in Connecticut 2: Ghosts of Georgia" never had a chance to succeed. First off, let's just get something out of the way. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |